Blog

Case Studies: How Marketplaces Got Sued (or Avoided It) Over IP
BLOG

Case Studies: How Marketplaces Got Sued (or Avoided It) Over IP

Reading Time: 2 minutes

The difference between a platform that gets sued for IP infringement and one that doesn’t?

It’s not luck.

It’s preparation, enforcement, and investment in proactive systems.

Here’s how major marketplaces have fared when it comes to intellectual property – and what every platform operator can learn from their wins and failures.

1. Redbubble: Profit-Sharing = Platform Liability

Redbubble promoted itself as a creative marketplace for artists. But it also:

  • Printed and shipped products featuring user-uploaded designs
  • Processed payments and customer service
  • Earned a share of the profit from every transaction

Several courts found that Redbubble wasn’t just a passive intermediary – it was actively facilitating and monetizing infringement.

Key rulings (e.g., Pokémon, Hells Angels, Atari cases) emphasized:

  • The platform’s integrated fulfillment model
  • Lack of robust, pre-upload IP enforcement
  • Failure to prevent repeat infringement of known IP

Lesson: Profit-sharing without proactive detection = liability.

2. Teespring: A Magnet for Brand Lawsuits

Teespring (now Spring) became a hub for viral POD designs – but also for rampant brand misuse.

They faced repeated lawsuits from rights holders, including:

  • NFL
  • Harley-Davidson
  • Marvel/Disney
  • Major universities

Why?

  • Minimal IP enforcement before content went live
  • Keyword manipulation by users to avoid detection
  • Lack of effective repeat infringer enforcement

Despite takedown procedures, courts and rights holders viewed Teespring as turning a blind eye to clear patterns of abuse.

Lesson: Ignoring scalable enforcement leads to legal fatigue – and brand distrust.

3. Etsy: Gradual Improvement Through Seller Tools

Etsy’s early model was also UGC-heavy, and it drew criticism for:

  • Infringing items (e.g., Disney-themed baby clothing)
  • Trademark misuse across categories
  • Inconsistent enforcement across sellers

But instead of relying on takedowns alone, Etsy:

  • Improved seller onboarding with clearer IP education
  • Built internal flagging tools for trademarked keywords
  • Partnered with rights holders on automated takedowns
  • Offered transparency dashboards for brands

While Etsy still gets flagged occasionally, its trajectory shows how platform investment can improve both reputation and legal protection.

4. Amazon: A Proactive Model with Brand Registry

Amazon’s scale made it a prime target for counterfeit and IP infringement claims. But rather than just reacting, they invested heavily in proactive infrastructure:

  • Launched Amazon Brand Registry for rights holders to manage listings
  • Built a dedicated internal enforcement team (and AI detection tools)
  • Implemented automated blocking and takedown workflows
  • Worked with regulators and brands on global compliance programs

The result?

Fewer lawsuits, stronger brand relationships, and recognition as a proactive platform, even if occasional issues still arise.

Lesson: Proactivity earns legal and industry credibility.

Takeaway: Proactive Platforms Get Sued Less – And Trusted More

Across all these cases, one truth stands out:

Platforms that invest in scalable, intelligent IP enforcement are more likely to avoid legal fallout – and keep creators, users, and brands on their side.

That means:

  • Going beyond takedowns
  • Catching risk before it goes live
  • Educating users
  • Using AI-powered systems like VISUA’s Infringio to enforce consistently, contextually, and at scale

Want to build a proactive IP defense like Amazon – not a cautionary tale like Teespring? Book a demo with VISUA today to see how Infringio works.

Disclaimer: Not Legal Advice

This content is provided for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or professional advice. The information reflects our understanding as of the date of publication and may not apply to every situation or jurisdiction. You should consult qualified legal counsel for advice tailored to your specific circumstances. Any actions taken based on this content are at your own risk. Neither VISUA nor its affiliates accept liability for any losses or damages arising from the use of this information.

Book A Demo

RELATED

BLOG BLOG
Redbubble, Teespring, and the Lessons of IP Enforcement Failures

Reading Time: 3 minutesPrint-on-demand (POD) platforms empower creators to design and sell products without holding inventory. But with that power…

Blog
BLOG BLOG
How AI Is Changing the Game in IP Enforcement

Reading Time: 2 minutesIP enforcement used to be simple: But today’s infringement landscape – especially for POD and UGC-heavy platforms…

Blog
BLOG BLOG
The Future of IP Compliance – Proactive vs. Reactive Models

Reading Time: 2 minutesFor years, most platforms treated IP compliance as a reactive function: But the market – and the…

Blog

Integrate Copyright and Trademark Checking Into Your Platform

Seamlessly integrating Infringio is quick and easy, and if you have questions, there are real people here to help. So start today; complete the contact form and our team will get straight back to you.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.